Majority of us today don’t know that we are actually eating genetically-engineered food. The reason for the lack of knowledge is that consumers are generally not provided with adequate information by both food manufacturers and health experts regarding the hazards of eating genetically altered food, and there has not been enough research devoted into it yet. The array of genetically modified foods runs the gauntlet, from GMO corn and rice, to fruits, vegetables and other foods. Here are a number of important reasons why we should fast track labeling genetically modified food.
Experts Want Government To Label GMO To Keep Dinnertime Safe russian food store
Health experts and food safety advocates today strongly advocate to label GMO. The reasons for doing this are aplenty. First, you need to know over half the soybean crop, and one-third of the corn grown in the US today is genetically modified. The ever-increasing influence of the biotech industry has also begun creeping into the agriculture sector, and this worries consumer groups and health and safety advocates. These groups fear that if the biotech sector captures a large segment of the agriculture industry, then they will have an easier time introducing GMO foods and other derivatives to the market, and they will also be able to influence the planting habits and practices of farmers.
The World Health Organization and the Food and agriculture Organization also recently met to discuss food safety laws pertaining to GMO foods. However, deep divisions have been created among the WHO and FAO’s member states with regard to genetically modified food. Some members have strongly pushed for compulsory GMO labeling, while others urge a wait-and-see approach, and insist that more tests be done on the safety and quality of GMO foods.
Label Genetically Modified Food To Warn Consumers About Bad GMO Food
According to food safety advocates, current food labeling laws are not that strong, despite the insistence by the US Food and drug Administration (FDA) that they are. The FDA says that they already require biotechnology firms to label which may cause allergies to consumers. Biotech firms and food manufacturers on the other hand, worry that labeling genetically modified food could lead to added costs, and increased reluctance from customers to purchase their products.
The United States has accepted an international standard allowing countries to ban the import of genetically modified food without having to conclusively prove that the food is unsafe to eat. While this does not force US government regulators to enforce strict food labeling laws, the new ruling has served to rally labeling advocates.
While the FDA has for a decade announced that genetic modification of food and its ingredients is generally safe, if a GMO food item contains allergy-inducing ingredients, then it must be labeled before being sold in the market. A large American food manufacturer though in 1998, Gerber, has announced that its baby food items will no longer contain any genetically modified ingredients or components. The FDA too is also currently considering a ruling that will require labeling genetically engineered food, as a result of persistent lobbying from food safety adherents and lawmakers in congress.